Ex parte ROBIN K. ELKINS et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-0069                                                          
          Application 08/110,493                                                      


          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner's rejection of claims 13-21, which constitute             
          all the claims remaining in the application.                                
          The claimed invention pertains to a laser apparatus which                   
          uses a solid regular pyramid having a square base and four                  
          triangular faces which meet at the apex.                                    
          Representative claim 13 is reproduced as follows:                           
               13.  A laser apparatus comprising a solid regular pyramid              
          made of laser material, having a square base and four triangular            
          faces of equal size and shape meeting at the apex and a laser               
          beam directed perpendicularly to said base and characterized as             
          having substantially 0E reflection.                                         
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Almasi et al. (Almasi)        3,631,362          Dec. 28, 1971              
          Koechner                      4,357,704          Nov. 02, 1982              
          Claims 13-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                      
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Koechner or Almasi.             
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the            
          respective details thereof.                                                 
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the evidence            
          of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support for the               
          rejections.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into                     
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007