Ex parte NOBUYOSHI ASANUMA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-0586                                                          
          Application 07/950,081                                                      


               Claim 1 reads as follows:                                              
               1.  A motor vehicle steering system for use on a motor                 
          vehicle, comprising:                                                        
               a steering wheel;                                                      
               means for determining a steering rate of said steering                 
          wheel;                                                                      
               at least one road wheel steerable by said steering wheel;              
               a steering actuator connected to said steering wheel for               
          turning the steering wheel;                                                 
               sensor means for detecting a motor vehicle behavior induced            
          by a disturbance applied to the motor vehicle; and                          
               control means for determining a control signal at least                
          based on the motor vehicle behavior detected by said sensor means           
          and for applying said control signal to said steering actuator to           
          turn said steering wheel in a direction to suppress the motor               
          vehicle behavior, said control signal including a control                   
          component serving to damp said steering rate, determined by said            
          steering rate determinating means, in a predetermined manner.               

               The Examiner’s Answer cites the following prior art:                   
          Ito et al. (Ito)              4,830,127           May  16, 1989             
          Sano et al. (Sano)            4,984,646           Jan. 15, 1991             

                                       OPINION                                        
               Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                    
          unpatentable over Ito.  Claims 1,2,6,7, 9-12, 14, and 15 stand              
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by Sano.  Claims 4,           
          5, 7, 8, 12, 13, and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as             
          unpatentable over Ito and Sano.                                             
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007