Ex parte SYRACUSE et al. - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                
                was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not                                                               
                binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                               
                                                                                                    Paper No. 20                              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                            _____________                                                                     
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                            _____________                                                                     
                                   Ex parte ANTHONY A. SYRACUSE, DONALD KENT,                                                                 
                                                        and ROY Y. TAYLOR                                                                     
                                                            _____________                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 96-0882                                                                    
                                                    Application 07/885,2171                                                                   
                                                           ______________                                                                     
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                          _______________                                                                     

                Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent                                                                
                Judges.                                                                                                                       
                CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                      

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    

                         This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1-5 and                                                         
                12-19, which constitute all the claims remaining in the                                                                       
                application.                                                                                                                  
                         We affirm in part.                                                                                                   




                         1Application for patent filed May 19, 1992.                                                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007