Ex parte RIGOSI et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 25              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                              Ex parte GIAN L. RIGOSI,                                
                         ROBERTO MARZOLA, GIAN P. GUIDETTI,                           
                           DINO BACCI, and GEORGES ASPERTI                            
                                     __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 96-1501                                   
                               Application 08/172,5171                                
                                     __________                                       
                                HEARD: Sep. 18, 1997                                  
                                     __________                                       

          Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and                       
          LYDDANE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.                         
          LYDDANE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's refusal            
          to allow claims 1 through 6, which are all of the claims pending            
          in the application.                                                         





             Application for patent filed December 21, 1993.1                                                                      
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007