THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CURTIS E. SCOTT
and CHARLES I. McVEY
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1931
Application 07/995,6351
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134
from the examiner's rejection of claims 1, 2 and 4-14, which
1 Application for patent filed December 18, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007