THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ROBERT M. McNAMARA
________________
Appeal No. 96-2266
Application 08/156,7941
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to
15, 26 and 36 to 38. Of the other claims in the application,
the examiner has allowed claims 27 to 35, and indicated that
Application for patent filed November 23, 1993.1
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/810,675, filed December 19, 1991, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007