Ex parte ANDERSON - Page 11

          Appeal No. 96-2372                                                          
          Application 08/278,676                                                      



          device and having installed thereon the well-known Windows™                 
          software at the time of appellants' invention would have been               
          responsive to the apparatus as defined in appellants' claims                
          on appeal.                                                                  


                                REVERSED AND REMANDED                                 



                    BRUCE H. STONER, JR.                )                             
                    Chief Administrative Patent Judge   )                             
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )   BOARD OF PATENT            
                    NEAL E. ABRAMS                      )     APPEALS AND             
                    Administrative Patent Judge         )    INTERFERENCES            
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                    CHARLES E. FRANKFORT                )                             
                    Administrative Patent Judge         )                             












                                          11                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007