THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ANTHONY B. CASTRO, PHILLIP L. LAFFOON, JAMES P. LAWHORN
and GARY T. SUITS
__________
Appeal No. 96-2416
Application 08/206,4471
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before MEISTER, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-15, all the claims in the application. We
reverse.
Appellants’ invention pertains to an ink jet printing
system, and in particular to an ink delivery system therefor that
1Application for patent filed March 4, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007