Ex parte HOLLAND - Page 12




          Appeal No. 96-3833                                                          
          ApplicationApplication 08/014,320                                                     


          1984).  Skill in the art is presumed, not the converse.  In re              
          Sovish, 769 F.2d 738, 743, 226 USPQ 771, 774 (Fed. Cir. 1985).              
               We will therefore sustain the examiner’s § 103 rejection of            
          claim 32. We will also sustain the § 103 rejection of claims 33             
          and 34 since, as noted supra, claims 33 and 34 stand or fall with           
          claim 32.                                                                   
               With regard to the rejection of claims 35 through 37 and 39,           
          the examiner relies upon the Bronnvall patent for a suggestion of           
          a PTC heating element corresponding to appellant’s claimed                  
          heating element to eliminate the need for a separate temperature            
          control.  He makes that following undisputed findings regarding             
          this reference:                                                             
               The patent to Bronnvall discloses an elongated,                        
               flexible strip (cable) heating element (see fig. 2)                    
               that is comprised of a pair of parallel, elongated,                    
               flat conductive members (1) with an elongated PTC                      
               material (4) disposed between and in contact with said                 
               conductive members such that electrical power supplied                 
               to said conductive members creates heat along the                      
               length of the strip heater.  Use of PTC material makes                 
               the heater self-regulating.  The patent to Bronnvall                   
               also discloses the heating element including an outer                  
               insulating layer (3).                                                  
               In arguing the patentability of claims 35 though 37 and 39             
          as a group, appellant contends, inter alia, that Bronnvall does             
          not suggest the modification proposed by the examiner.  Appellant           
          goes on to argue that even if the modification were suggested,              

                                         -12-                                         




Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007