THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 47
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SIEGFRIED R. WISSMANN,
WILLIAM T. SCHMITT, and
DAVID E. MURDOCK
__________
Appeal No. 97-0576
Application 08/308,8761
__________
HEARD: Nov. 10, 1997
__________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and COHEN and
LYDDANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LYDDANE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's
refusal to allow claims 3 and 5 through 10, which are all of the
claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed September 19, 1994.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 08/008,014, filed January 22, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007