Appeal No. 97-1025
Application No. 08/183,571
Claims 1 to 8, 10 to 15, 20 to 33, 35, 37, 38 and 40 to 44
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being
indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly
claim the subject matter which the appellant regards as the
invention.
Claims 1 to 3, 6, 8, 10 to 15, 20, 38 and 40 to 44 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by, or in
the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Kato.
Claims 1 to 8, 10 to 12, 20, 21, 23, 25 to 33, 35, 37, 38,
43 and 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by, or in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Niemeyer.
Claims 1, 2, 5 to 7, 20 to 33, 37 and 38 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by, or in the
alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Rose.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007