|
|
Court OpinionsState LawsUS CodeUS Constitution |
Ex parte PARKER et al. - Page 1Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1997 > Ex parte PARKER et al. - Page 1 Sponsored Links
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JAMES R. PARKER, WILLIAM J. MURPHY,
CHARLES L. THOMECZEK JR., DANIEL L. KENNEDY,
GARY T. NEEL and DAVID E. STORVICK
__________
Appeal No. 97-2142
Application 08/114,8961
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-7,
the only claims present in the application. We reverse.
The appellants’ invention pertains to a blood coagulation
1Application for patent filed August 31, 1993.
1
|