THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte THOMAS G. FELDPAUSCH
and CARL V. FORSLUND
_____________
Appeal No. 97-4240
Application 08/294,0741
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 4-
12, 22-26, 28 and 30. Claims 13-20, 27 and 31, the only other
claims remaining in the application, have been indicated as being
allowable subject to the requirement that they be rewritten to
1Application for patent filed August 22, 1994. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 08/063,463, filed May 18, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007