MCDILDA et al. V. DRUMMOND et al. - Page 1
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1997 > MCDILDA et al. V. DRUMMOND et al. - Page 1
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
JOSEPH C. McDILDA and MICHAEL J. RICE,
MICHAEL T. DRUMMOND, GENERAL TAYLOR and W. GERALD GAINEY
Interference No. 103,638
Before CALVERT, METZ and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a), the concession of priority
filed by McDilda et al. is treated as a request for entry of an
1Application 07/638,390, filed January 7, 1991, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,084,284, issued January 28, 1992. Assignors to The
Pillsbury Co.; Minneapolis, MN.
2Application 07/746,056, filed August 12, 1991, accorded
benefit of U.S. Application 07/621,219, filed November 30, 1990.
Assignors to Sonoco Products Co., a corporation at Hartsville,
Page: 1 2 3
Last modified: November 3, 2007