Court Opinions
State Laws
|
SCHAD et al. V. GOTO et al. - Page 1
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1997 > SCHAD et al. V. GOTO et al. - Page 1
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
HANS P. SCHAD, STEPHEN M. KELLY, EIKE POETSCH,
REINHARD HITTICH and GEORG WEBER
Junior Party,1
v.
YASUYUKI GOTO, SHIGERU SUGIMORI
and TETSUYA OGAWA
Senior Party.2
________________
Interference No. 103,888
Before URYNOWICZ, SOFOCLEOUS and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
1Application 08/041,349, filed April 1, 1993. Accorded
Benefit of U.S. Applications 07/444,251, filed December 1,
1989 and 06/815,708, filed December 16, 1985, now Patent No.
4,710,315, issued December 1, 1987. Assignor to Merck GmbH.
2Application 06/867,680, filed May 28, 1986, now U.S.
Patent No. 4,797,228, issued January 10, 1989. Assignor to
Chisso Corporation, Osaka, Japan.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|
|