DONALD et al. V. BAUMANN et al. - Page 1
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1997 > DONALD et al. V. BAUMANN et al. - Page 1
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
DAVID KEITH DONALD, MARK FURBER
and MARTIN EDWARD COOPER
Junior Party,1
v.
KARL BAUMANN and GERHARD EMMER
Senior Party.2
________________
Interference No. 103,831
________________
Before URYNOWICZ, SOFOCLEOUS and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
SOFOCLEOUS, Administrative Patent Judge.
Application 07/924,067, filed September 11, 1992, now1
U.S. Patent No. 5,296,489, issued March 22, 1994. Accorded
Benefit of PCT Application PCT/GB91/00393, filed
March 13, 1991. Assignors to FISONS, Ipswich, England
Application 08/276,276, filed July 18, 1994. Accorded2
Benefit of U.S. Applications 07/697,864, filed May 9, 1991,
now U.S. Patent No. 5,352,671, issued October 4, 1994 and
07/609,280, filed November 5, 1990, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|
