Appeal No. 94-1484 Application 07/536,556 researchers” acknowledged by appellants at page 21 of the specification is prior art, it would appear to be relevant in determining the patentability of the subject matter on appeal. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED William F. Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Teddy S. Gron ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) Elizabeth C. Weimar ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007