THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte FERDINAND C. HAASE and
DEAN E. CRESS
_____________
Appeal No. 94-2279
Application 07/687,8191
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and WEIMAR, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1 through
22. Claims 23 through 73 are pending but have been withdrawn from consideration by the
examiner.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed April 19, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007