THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LEE R. BECK and RALPH J. STOLLE
____________
Appeal No. 94-3222
Application 07/815,6301
____________
HEARING: July 16, 1998
Application for patent filed December 30, 1991.1
According to applicants, this application is a continuation
of Application 07/548,419, filed July 5, 1990, now abandoned;
which is (1) a continuation-in-part of Application 07/431,639,
filed November 6, 1989, now U.S. 5,130,128, issued July 14, 1992;
and (2) a continuation-in-part of Application 07/177,223, filed
April 4, 1988, now U.S. 4,956,349, issued September 11, 1990.
Application 07/431,639 is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/161,039, filed February 26, 1988, now U.S. 4,879,110, issued
November 7, 1989. Both Applications 07/161,039 and 07/177,223
are continuations-in-part of Application 07/001,848, filed
January 9, 1987, now U.S. 4,897,265, issued January 30, 1990;
which is a divisional of Application 06/546,162, filed October 27,
1983, now U.S. 4,636,384, issued October 23, 1990; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 06/384,625, filed June 3,
1982, now abandoned. U.S. 4,636,384 was reissued as U.S. Re.
33,403 on October 23, 1990.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007