THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte G. ALLAN STAHL, AHMAD MORADI-
ARAGHI, I. JOHN WESTERMAN
and HENRY L. HSIEH
_____________
Appeal No. 94-4409
Application 07/958,5261
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 USC § 134 from the final
1 Application for patent filed October 28, 1992. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/788,051, filed November 5, 1991, which
is a division of Application 06/756,851, filed July 18, 1985, now Patent No. 5,080,809,
granted January 14, 1992, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 06/568,363,
filed January 9, 1984, now Patent No. 4,951,921, granted August 28, 1990, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 06/461,707, filed January 28, 1983, now Patent No.
4,644,020, granted February 17, 1987.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007