Ex parte AKITOMO et al. - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                         Paper No. 16                         
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                    Ex parte HIROSHI AKITOMO and TSUGIO NOZOE                                                                 
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 95-0227                                                                    
                                                Application No. 08/061,4061                                                                   
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                Before CAROFF, METZ and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent                                                                    
                Judges.                                                                                                                       
                CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                          


                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of                                                            
                claims 1-2, all the pending claims in the involved application.                                                               
                         The claims relate to a “clay-like” composition including a                                                           
                diorganopolysiloxane, a synthetic resin powder and a liquid                                                                   
                paraffin.                                                                                                                     





                         1Application for patent filed May 12, 1993.                                                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007