THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD R. OLLMANN JR.
__________
Appeal No. 95-0266
Application 07/851,5171
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 6, 10 and 11. The only other claims in the
application, which are claims 2 through 5, 7 through 9, and 12,
stand withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner as
being directed to nonelected inventions.
1Application for patent filed March 16, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007