THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 78
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte KUNIO TAKANOHASHI, MITSUTAKA TANAKA
and TORU YAMANO
________________
Appeal No. 95-0334
Application 08/002,5131
________________
HEARD: February 6, 1998
________________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and CAROFF, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed January 8, 1993.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/866,092, filed April 6, 1992; which is a
continuation of Application 07/723,653, filed June 26, 1991;
which is a continuation of Application 07/204,527, filed June
8, 1988; all abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007