THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ROBERT T. DORR and DAVID S. ALBERTS
________________
Appeal No. 95-0368
Application No. 07/973,2111
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and JOHN D. SMITH,
Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting
claims 9 through 12. Claims 1 through 8 and 13 through 15, which
are the only other claims remaining in the application, stand
Application for patent filed November 6, 1992. According1
to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/788,157, filed November 6, 1991, now abandoned; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/715,722, filed
June 14, 1991, now abandoned; which is a continuation of
Application No. 07/377,062, filed July 10, 1989, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/344,213,
filed April 27, 1989, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007