THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ARNOLD S. PRYWES
________________
Appeal No. 95-0423
Application 07/696,8591
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, STAAB
and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-32
and 34-63, all the claims in the application. We affirm-in-
part.
Appellant’s invention pertains to a shunt for use in the
1Application for patent filed May 8, 1991.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007