Ex parte BAKER et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                               Paper No. 21           

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                  ________________                                    
                   Ex parte GEOFFREY H. BAKER, RODERICK J. DORGAN,                    
             DAVID O. MORGAN, PETER R. SHELLEY and SIMON E. BLANCHFLOWER              
                                  ________________                                    
                                 Appeal No. 95-0544                                   
                             Application No. 07/798,9711                              
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    
          Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and JOHN D. SMITH,                         
          Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
          WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision                     
          rejecting claims 12 and 14 through 17, which are all of the                 
          claims remaining in the application.                                        

               Application for patent filed November 29, 1991.1                                                                     
          According to appellants, this application is a continuation of              
          Application No. 07/525,094, filed May 17, 1990, now abandoned.              

                                         -1-                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007