Appeal No. 95-0761 Application 08/050,511 inadequate written description. A specification complies with the 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, enablement requirement if it allows those of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the claimed invention without undue experimentation. See In re Wright, 999 F.2d 1557, 1561, 27 USPQ2d 1510, 1513 (Fed. Cir. 1993); Atlas Powder Co. v. E. I. du Pont De Nemours & Co., 750 F.2d 1569, 1576, 224 USPQ 409, 413 (Fed. Cir. 1984). As stated by the court in Wright, 999 F.2d at 1561-62, 27 USPQ2d at 1513: Nothing more than objective enablement is required, and therefore it is irrelevant whether this teaching is provided through broad terminology or illustrative examples. [citation omitted] When rejecting a claim under the enablement requirement of section 112, the PTO bears an initial burden of setting forth a reasonable explanation as to why it believes that the scope of protection provided by that claim is not adequately enabled by the description of the invention provided in the specification of the application; this includes, of course, providing sufficient reasons for doubting any assertions in the specification as to the scope of enablement. If the PTO meets this burden, the burden then shifts to the applicant to provide suitable proofs indicating that the specification is indeed enabling. The examiner’s statements that appellant’ specification does not disclose information and selection criteria for the pigmented adhesive do not constitute a reasonable explanation as to why the scope of protection provided by appellant’s claims is not enabled by appellant’s specification. The examiner has provided no evidence or reasoning which shows that one of ordinary skill in the art, given appellant’s original disclosure, would not have been able to practice appellant’s claimed invention without undue experimentation. Hence, we conclude that the examiner has not carried his burden of establishing a prima facie case of lack of enablement. 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007