THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KEISHI OHASHI
____________
Appeal No. 95-0800
Application 07/840,2761
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before and THOMAS, FLEMING and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-
10, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application.
Application for patent filed February 24, 1992.1
According to appellant, this application is a continuation-in-
part of Application 07/707,439 filed May 28, 1991, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 07/316,834 filed February
28, 1989.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007