THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte STEN R. GERFAST, EUGENE S. JOHNSON,
EDDIE T. MORIOKA, THEODORE A. SCHWARZ
and ROBERT W. TAPANI
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0833
Application 08/161,9781
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed December 3, 1993. According
to the appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/945,599, filed September 16, 1992, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 07/732,729, filed July 18,
1991, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application
07/464,290, filed January 12, 1990, now abandoned, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/322,617, filed March 13,
1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007