Appeal No. 95-0840
Application 08/029,343
The end result of appellants’ invention is a mixer control
signal that varies from 0.0 to 1.0 which the artisan would have
well recognized by definition is some form of modified version of
a conventionally defined non-additive mixer which traditionally
provides only variations of zero or one as modifying elements to
the conventional equation represented at the bottom of page 4 of
appellants’ written description. Accordingly, we find that
appellants’ claimed invention is definite within the second
paragraph and adequately disclosed within the first paragraph of
35 U.S.C. § 112.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner
rejecting claims 27 to 32, 34 to 40 and 42 to 51 under the first
and second paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007