Ex parte MULLER - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                    
                (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                      
                (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                    
                                                                                                    Paper No. 27                              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                               Ex parte KLAUS-HELMUT MULLER                                                                   
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                                        Appeal No. 95-0882                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/024,5711                                                                   
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                              __________                                                                      

                Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent                                                                 
                Judges.                                                                                                                       
                GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                          

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1                                                              
                through 8, 10 and 11.  The only other claim in the application,                                                               
                which is claim 9, stands withdrawn from further consideration by                                                              
                the examiner as being directed to a nonelected invention.                                                                     


                         1Application for patent filed March 1, 1993.                                                                         
                                                                      1                                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007