Ex parte GILLIS et al. - Page 1




                                                       Paper No. 18                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                   _______________                                    
                             Ex parte HERBERT R. GILLIS                               
                                and JOHN R. ROBERTSON                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 95-0999                                   
                              Application 07/925,3471                                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                   ON BRIEF                                           
                                   _______________                                    
          Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and PAK, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           
                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Gillis et al. (appellants) appeal from the examiner’s                  
          final rejection of claims 1 through 21 and 27 through 32,                   
          which are all of the claims remaining in the application.                   


               Application for patent filed August 4, 1992.1                                                                     
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007