Ex parte MCCARTNEY - Page 1




                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                               
                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                              
                     today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                
                     journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            
                                                                                        Paper No. 30                   
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                          Ex parte THOMAS McCARTNEY                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                              Appeal No. 95-1188                                                       
                                        Application No. 08/046,1271                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                              HEARD: May 5, 1998                                                       
                                                   ____________                                                        
              Before HAIRSTON, TORCZON and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent                                           
              Judges.                                                                                                  
              HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   


                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                            This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                                     
              through 24.                                                                                              
                     The disclosed invention relates to an external DC power                                           
              supply for supplying DC power to a supported device that has an                                          
              AC input connector adapted for connecting the supported device to                                        



                     Application for patent filed April 12, 1993.  According to1                                                                                                
              the appellant, the application is a continuation of Application                                          
              No. 07/578,952, filed September 7, 1990, now abandoned.                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007