THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RENE N. LAROSE and JOSEPH A. SCHULTZ
____________
Appeal No. 95-1528
Application 07/952,6841
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, GRON, and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134
This is an appeal from an examiner’s final rejection of
Claims 39-57, all claims pending in this application. All claims
stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable in
Application for patent filed September 29, 1992. According1
to applicants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/721,296, filed June 26, 1991, now abandoned.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007