Ex parte GUPTA - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-1711                                                          
          Application No. 08/063,819                                                  


               17.  A method of degating molded parts comprising the                  
          steps of:                                                                   
               (a) providing an injection molding material capable of                 
          being molded in an injection molding apparatus;                             
               (b) molding a solid configuration from said molding                    
          material comprising parts secured to a runner system by gates               
          of said molding material, said gates having a cross-section                 
          substantially smaller than any cross-section of said molded                 
          configuration which is contacting and integral therewith;                   
               (c) cooling the surfaces of said configuration to a                    
          temperature and for a time until only said gates become                     
          brittle; and                                                                
               (d) applying an impact to said configuration while said                
          gates are brittle to cause said configuration to sever at said              
          gates and separate said runner system from said parts.                      
               The references of record relied upon by the examiner are:              
          Jones et al. (Jones)     3,468,077                                          
               Sep. 23, 1969                                                          
          Oishi et al. (Oishi)     5,190,712                                          
               Mar.  2, 1993                                                          
               The appealed claims stand rejected for obviousness                     
          (35 U.S.C. § 103) as unpatentable over Oishi or certain                     
          admitted prior art in view of Jones.  Additionally, claims 17,              
          19, 21 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                   
          paragraph, “enablement requirement.”                                        
               We reverse.                                                            



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007