Ex parte MARTIN - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                    
                (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                      
                (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                    

                                                                                                    Paper No. 18                              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                                 Ex parte RICHARD A. MARTIN                                                                   
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                                        Appeal No. 95-1744                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/216,5431                                                                   
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                              __________                                                                      

                Before McCANDLISH Senior Administrative Patent Judge and                                                                      
                MEISTER and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                           
                MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                         

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         Richard Martin (the appellant) appeals from the final                                                                
                rejection of claims 8-14 and 16.  Claim 15 has been indicated as                                                              
                being allowable subject to the requirement that it be rewritten                                                               
                to include all the subject matter of the claims from which it                                                                 


                         1Application for patent filed March 23, 1994.                                                                        
                                                                      1                                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007