THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RICHARD W. HOLT
_____________
Appeal No. 95-1859
Application 08/055,1001
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before: HARKCOM, Vice-Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
and McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Application for patent filed May 3, 1993. The real party in interest appears to1
be Lexmark International, Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007