Ex parte HO et al. - Page 3




                    Appeal No. 95-1923                                                                                                                                     
                    Application 08/051,987                                                                                                                                 


                    having a shorter duration and/or a higher signal to noise ratio can be obtained than can typically                                                     
                    be obtained using a single stage optical gate.  In a two gate embodiment, Kerr gates are                                                               
                    configured by arranging a non-linear Kerr cell, first and second polarizers and first and second                                                       
                    analyzers so that the first polarizer, the Kerr cell and the first analyzer form a first optical Kerr                                                  
                    gate and the second polarizer, the same Kerr cell and the second analyzer form a second optical                                                        
                    Kerr gate, the second polarizer having a polarization axis parallel to that of said first analyzer.                                                    
                    Appellants’ Figs. 8 and 9 illustrate two of appellants’ embodiments.                                                                                   
                                                                            The Prior Art                                                                                  
                              In his figure, Siebert discloses a pair of optical Kerr cells OKC-1 and OKC-2 and                                                            
                    associated alternately crossed polarizers P4, P5 and P6 serially disposed at the output of laser 26,                                                   
                    with polarizer P5 disposed between the two Kerr cells.                                                                                                 
                                                         The Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102/103                                                                           
                              After consideration of the positions and arguments presented by both the examiner and the                                                    
                    appellants, we have concluded that the rejection should not be sustained.                                                                              
                              We do not agree with the examiner’s position to the effect that the non-linear medium,                                                       
                    referred to four times in claim 19, is not a structure but is only a limitation of a type of material                                                  








                                                                                    3                                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007