Ex parte SCHLUND et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-1959                                                          
          Application 07/894,128                                                      
                    The references of record which are being relied on                
          by the examiner as evidence of nonobviousness are:                          
          Maemoto et al. (Maemoto)       4,098,979        July 4, 1978                
          Welborn, Jr. (Welborn)         4,897,455        January 30, 1990            
          Winter et al. (Winter)         5,081,322        January 14, 1992            

          Takahashi, Japanese Kokai No. 63-92621, published April 23,                 
          19882                                                                       
                    The appealed claims stand rejected as being                       
          unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 from the disclosure of                   
          Welborn, considered with Takahashi, Maemoto and Winter. We                  
          affirm.                                                                     
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
                    Maemoto discloses a method for the preparation of                 
          easily pourable polyolefin granules by polymerizing an olefin               
          in the presence of a catalyst system having a main catalyst                 
          component supported on a spheroidal particle of a high                      
          molecular weight used as a carrier and an organometallic                    
          compound (column 1, lines 7 through 14).  The high molecular                
          weight compounds used as a carrier include polyethylene,                    
          polypropylene and polybutylene (column 2, lines 28 through                  

           All reference to Takahashi in this opinion is a2                                                                      
          reference  to the complete English language translation of the              
          Japanese document, a copy of which was furnished to appellants              
          by the examiner in his first Office action.                                 
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007