THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion (1) was not written for publication and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
In re WILLEM G. OPHEIJ
and JOZEF P.H. BENSCHOP
____________
Appeal No. 95-2003
Application No. 08/074,2651
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
BACKGROUND
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 23-26, 33, and 37. The examiner objects to
claims 29-32 and 34-36 as depending from rejected claims.
(Examiner's Answer at 8.) No other claims are pending. We
reverse.
The subject matter of the invention is a device for
optically reading information from or writing information onto a
record carrier having a plurality of information tracks (e.g. a
1 Attorney docket no. PHN 13,236B.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007