THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HELMUT HONIG, GEORG PAMPOUCHIDIS,
WILLIBALD PAAR, HERBERT MATZER and
MANFRED VALTROVIC
____________
Appeal No. 95-2008
Application No. 08/032,1781
____________
HEARD: November 4, 1998
____________
Before GARRIS, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 13 through 21, which are
the only claims remaining in this application.
1Application for patent filed March 15, 1993. According
to applicants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/739,854, filed August 2, 1991; now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007