Ex parte MINGLEDORFF - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 95-2264                                                                                                                     
                 Application 08/125,750                                                                                                                 


                 through 22 are all of the claims remaining in this application.  Claims 1 through 4 and                                                
                 10 have been canceled.                                                                                                                 
                         Appellant's invention relates to an auxiliary, after-market, rearview mirror                                                  
                 assembly for attachment to a conventional side-mounted rearview mirror that is already                                                 
                 mounted on a vehicle.  Objectives of appellant's invention are (1) to eliminate the blind                                              
                 spot which exists when only using a conventional flat or convex side-mounted vehicle                                                   
                 rearview mirror, and (2) to increase the angular viewing range of such conventional                                                    
                 mirrors without requiring replacement of the conventional mirrors.  Claims 21 and 22                                                   
                 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of those claims appears                                                  
                 in the Appendix to appellant's brief.                                                                                                  
                         The prior art references relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed                                                
                 claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:                                                                                                      
                 Bloom                                                  4,223,983                            Sep. 23, 1980                              
                 Otaka                                                   2,144,240                            Jun.   4, 1990                            
                 (Japanese Patent)3                                                                                                                     
                 Musinu                                                    443,990                            Aug. 28, 1991                             
                 (European Patent Application)                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                                       

                         Based on the examiner's commentary on pages 1 through 4 of the examiner's                                                     


                          3Our understanding of this Japanese language document is based upon a                                                         
                 translation prepared for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.  A copy of that                                                         
                 translation accompanies this decision.                                                                                                 
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007