Appeal No. 95-2382
Application 07/955,671
affirmed. The rejection of claim 14 as it depends upon claims 1-
6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over EP ‘493 in view of
Di Mino and Finnicum is affirmed.
D. Summary
The rejection of claims 8, 10, 27, 31 and (8, 10, 27,
31)/11-13 under § 103 is reversed, as are the rejections
involving claims 9, 28-30, and 32, since these claims depend upon
claims 8 and 27. The rejections of claims 1, 5, 6 and (1, 5,
6)/11-13 under § 102(b), claims 2-4 and (2-4)/11-13 under § 103,
claim 15 under § 103, and claim 14 as it depends upon claims 1-6
under § 103 are affirmed. Accordingly, the decision of the
examiner is affirmed-in-part.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007