THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte GUY A. WOJTANEK
_______________
Appeal No. 95-2405
Application 07/969,6631
_______________
HEARD: Jan. 15, 1998
_______________
Before KRASS, LEE, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 3 through 6, 8 and 9. Claims 1 and 2 have been canceled
and claim 7 has been indicated by the examiner as being
allowable.
The invention pertains to a windshield wiper/washer switch,
the details of which are made clear from an analysis of
independent claim 8, the only independent claim before us on this
appeal.
Claim 8 reads as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007