THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte THOMAS A. CHIMENTI, DANIEL
K. NG and RAYMOND R. RAABER
_____________
Appeal No. 95-2768
Application 08/019,7001
______________
HEARD: December 8, 1997
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 14, 17, 18 and 28 to 30. Claims 20 to 25, the other2
claims remaining in the application, stand withdrawn from
consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as being directed to a
1 Application for patent filed February 19, 1993. According to appellants,
the application is a division of Application 07/829,282, filed February 3, 1992.
2 Claims 14, 16 to 19 and 27 to 29 were finally rejected, but in an
amendment filed on October 25, 1994 (Paper No. 13), claims 16, 19 and 27 were
cancelled, and claim 30 was added.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007