Appeal No. 95-2784
Application 08/193,634
the workpiece along each of the multiple axes as recited in
Appellant's claims. Furthermore, we fail to find any
suggestion in Hyatt or Daggett to provide a single active
processor to perform these functions. Therefore, we will not
sustain the Examiner's rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1
through 3, 18 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 or 103.
Accordingly, the Examiner's decision is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF
PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge )
INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007