THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KENICHI KOTANI
____________
Appeal No. 95-3001
Application No. 08/195,8441
____________
HEARD: May 7, 1998
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 4. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 15),
claim 5 was added to the application. Accordingly, claims 1
through 5 are on appeal.
1Application for patent filed February 14, 1994.
According to the appellant, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/998,602 filed December 30, 1992, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007