Ex parte TAKIZAWA - Page 1




                                     THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                         
              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                          
              publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 
                                                                                      Paper No. 14                        
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                   _____________                                                          
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   _____________                                                          
                                           Ex parte NOBORU TAKIZAWA                                                       
                                                   _____________                                                          
                                                Appeal No. 95-3091                                                        
                                            Application 08/093,3111                                                       
                                                  ______________                                                          
                                                HEARD: May 4, 1998                                                        
                                                  _______________                                                         
              Before KRASS, BARRETT and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
              LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                           
                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                            This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                                            
              from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-5, the only                                                 
              claims in the application.  No claim has been allowed.                                                      
                                   References relied on by the Examiner                                                   
              McCullough et al. (McCullough)     4,979,054     Dec. 18, 1990                                              
              Yoshimura et al. (Yoshimura)       5,063,453     Nov.  5, 1991                                              
                                           The Rejections on Appeal                                                       
                            Claims 1-5 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                                           

                Application for patent filed February 2, 1993.1                                                                                                    
                                                            1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007