Appeal No. 95-3161
Application 08/090,921
thereof, must be placed below the flipper mechanism. That,
however, the examiner has not shown to be so in Tamachi.
For the foregoing reasons, we do not sustain the
rejection of claims 1, 5 and 9 as being unpatentable over
Tamachi and Taylor.
Conclusion
The rejection of claims 1, 5 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph, as being indefinite is reversed.
The rejection of claims 1, 5 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Tamachi and Taylor is reversed.
REVERSED
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007