Appeal No. 95-3254
Application 08/029,492
The above quoted limitation requires a display and a
projector. Araki provides only an LCD display 3. The
fluorescent lamp 6 is a light source for the front lighted LCD
display panel 3. However, the fluorescent lamp 6 does not
project any information let alone video information from any
source. Thus, there is no information projected from the central
processing unit as claimed as well by the fluorescent lamp 6. It
is only the liquid crystal display 3 that displays information
from the word processor 1, which we conclude the artisan would
have recognized would have inherently included a central
processing unit. Araki’s device also does not include within any
single element, the claimed lid portion, both a display and a
projector of any kind.
The remaining independent claims contain a similar
limitation as just quoted with respect to claim 1. Independent
claims 18 and 19 contain a similarly recited lid portion with the
display and projector for respectively projecting video
information and images. The lid portion of independent claim 20
contains a display and a projector for displaying images from the
central processing unit. Finally, independent claim 31 also
recites the removable lid having a display portion and an
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007